Drown: A Plan Built for Success
Drown, by Junot Diaz,
surprised me with the way it was written. Despite having plenty of emotional
scenes that readers would expect to include many of the characters’ inner
feelings, Diaz rarely shows the reader the characters’ feelings outright. Why
Diaz would seemingly leave out so many feelings seemed confusing at first. But,
when analyzed more closely, this is a style employed by Diaz that works
perfectly for the book. By looking at the effect that not directly giving
characters’ feelings has on both the reader and the characters, we can get
closer to determining Diaz’s intentions for doing this.
Diaz intentionally
leaves out the obvious feelings of the characters as a way to let readers
relate to the different and unfamiliar situations that the characters find
themselves in, while also keeping the characters interesting, relatable, and
important to the story. To build on this, Diaz guides the reader with more
subtle and disguised feelings of his characters towards the themes of the story,
once the reader has made connections to the text itself. This technique allows
the reader to better understand the themes presented by Diaz in the story,
because understanding why Diaz leaves out obvious feelings and includes subtle
ones helps readers decipher the characters in the story themselves, who help
deliver the themes of the book.
This technique is
valuable because connecting to characters whose feelings are told to you,
especially in an unfamiliar situation, does not aid adaptation to the book. This style of leaving few feelings for the
reader to easily see is important to allow the reader to adapt to the story. Instead
of being forced to feel something unfamiliar, the reader can adapt the
situation to make him or herself more familiar to it. In one example of an
emotional scene, Diaz offers little evidence of what characters actually felt.
Instead, the narrator fills the gap with description and dialogue. “She’s gone,
he said. So cry all you want, malcriado. I learned later from Rafa that she was
in Ocoa with our tios. Mami’s time away
from us was never discussed, then or now. When she returned to us, five weeks
later, she was thinner and darker…”(Diaz 84). This scene is intentionally left
open by Diaz, to let the readers imagine the situation for themselves, and feel
for themselves as well. The reader, at first, has room to connect to the
passage however he or she chooses to. This technique allows initial connections
to the text to be made.
Diaz allows for
this kind of outside-in connection by being ambiguous and leaving space for
feelings. In the text, he doesn’t specify any feelings directly, nor does he
make it clear what you are “supposed” to feel in this situation. The words are
descriptive, but not very forceful. This allows the reader to take the text,
add in feelings that he or she sees as fitting, and have an easier time making
connections to the familiarized version of the text.
This “ambiguous
description” serves as the beginning of how Diaz connects his readers to
seemingly strange and unfamiliar situations, but to connect the reader with the
themes of the story, Diaz does more.
Diaz guides the reader towards his point with subtle descriptions and
actions, which hint at the feelings of the characters, and move the reader
towards themes of the story. The reader overlooks these subtle pieces of text
at first, which is key to the success of this style. Diaz draws the reader into
the text with open connections that the reader makes. But once the reader is
drawn into the text, and begins to connect with the text, these subtle parts
are more visible to the reader. These subtle feelings act as a railway, guiding
the reader towards the main ideas of the book.
Diaz employs this
subtle indication of feelings in the passage discussed before, and it
compliments and builds off of the open connections the reader makes. Although
not immediately obvious, Diaz shows that Yunior was, in fact, upset and
saddened by his mother’s departure. Diaz writing “so cry all you want,
malcriado”(Diaz 84) shows that in fact, Yunior had been crying over his mother’s
leaving, and from this, readers start to see some of the main ideas Diaz wishes
to present, like that of the importance of family. This passage originally drew
the reader in with its open connections because of its lack of obvious feelings.
But after this “phase” of Diaz’s style, the reader was subjected to the more
subtle feelings of the passage, which Diaz uses to guide readers towards some
of his main ideas.
Diaz’s two-phase
plan of open connection and then subtle guiding effectively connects the reader
first to the book itself, and then to main ideas. In books that are not
designed and built as eloquently as Drown, the reader is thrown into
unfamiliarity, and the main ideas are harder to see, even if the book is less
complex. Being thrown into an unfamiliar situation without the gentle touch
Diaz uses disorients the reader and makes possible themes seem less powerful. Take,
for example, a clearly emotional scene in Emily Rodda’s Deltora Quest
series: “He felt excitement, eagerness, and a thrill of fear at the thought of
what was ahead” (Rodda 131). The reader is directly given the feelings of a
character. Indeed, the reader does not have to do anything to realize this feeling
but read. This makes possible themes of personal empowerment or, maybe, bravery
less obvious, and less potent. The reader, without connecting to the text, has
no way to communicate with these main ideas, and so the main ideas do not speak
to the reader with the same kind of power as the themes do in Drown.
Just as important
as being able to relate and connect to characters in the story are the
characters being complex and unique. Without this, relating to the characters
would be like relating to a bar of soap- there would be nothing to gain from
Diaz’s work to connect readers with the characters through their feelings. Diaz’s
style, though, manages to both connect the reader to characters, and develop
the characters to be intricate, complex, and realistic.
One way that Diaz
makes his characters more complex is through the direct feelings Diaz does
leave in, and the effect of having so few obvious feelings otherwise. Feelings
that are left in by Diaz are wormholes into another dimension- they are portals
that allows us to, finally, look inside parts of the heads of the characters.
Instead of being very “two-dimensional” characters in a 3D world, where we can
look over the character and see everything inside, the characters are
three-dimensional, and so we are limited. We are limited to seeing only what
Diaz gives to the reader in these “wormholes”. This “three-dimensional”
character is more complex, and it makes it harder for the reader to learn more
about the characters than Diaz allows the reader to learn. This limited
knowledge makes the character more interesting because we cannot predict every
action characters make, and characteristics of different characters are
revealed to the reader as the stories go on.
This limited
knowledge also makes characters far more realistic. They mimic reality because
people also do not know everything about each other in real life. It makes the
story seem more real when the reader is not always inside the character’s head,
but instead looks on from the outside, wondering what the character is thinking
or wondering what the character will do next. This sort of incremental
character composition, slowly letting the reader into the character, provides
this “real” aspect of the characters.
This incremental
character composition that Diaz uses shows little about the character, but
enough so that the reader can make important connections to the character that
develop the character for the reader. When Yunior is talking about his dad, this is shown.
Through most of the book up to this point, Yunior had rarely shown the reader
emotion. Finally, though, we get a small window through a big emotion. “It was
like my God-given duty to piss [my dad] off, to do everything the way he hated.
Our fights didn’t bother me too much. I still wanted him to love me…” (Diaz
24). Here, Diaz is giving us an obvious emotion from Yunior. These crucial
points give the window into the character. From just this emotion, Diaz lets
the reader see and understand much more about Yunior and his relationship with
his dad. This is a driving force for the story at that point because readers,
like meeting any other family for the first time, know very little about the
relationship between father and son. This means that to the reader, the
characters are complex, and are useful to understanding the story as a whole
when they do give information that moves the story.
Aside from this
slow and steady character development through remaining feelings in the story,
Diaz also uses the lack of many direct feelings to develop his characters so
that they are relatable. An important way to make characters relatable is by
making them seem more human by bonding or connecting characters, which is a
very human idea. The characters’ feelings, though, are often hidden from the
reader for some time, which would seem to make character interaction very difficult.
However, if the characters did not interact effectively with one another, they
wouldn’t be complex or meaningful to the story, and they wouldn’t be as
relatable. Diaz solves this paradox effectively by using the actions of the
characters to help connect the characters to one another.
Diaz’s characters
interact through actions, specifically dialogue and description, and connect to
the reader through the open connections that Diaz allows. This technique allows
for complex characters that can also be related to.
Even though
feelings are often subtle and take time to figure out, Diaz uses dialogue and
actions to create interesting and complex character interactions. Yunior’s
narration shows this technique. “We’re taking the day off, she [Mom] announced.
A day for us as a family. But we don’t need a day off, I said and Rafa hit me
harder than normal. Shut up, OK? I tried to hit him back but Abuelo grabbed us
both by the arm. Don’t make me have to crack your heads open, he said” (Diaz
85). Feelings are sparse or subtle in the text, but the actions and discussion
between characters make for interesting interaction between the characters. We
see the action of Rafa hitting Yunior, and the dialogue between those two, and
their grandfather as well. The combination of these is a situation that
includes lots of interaction.
Aside from helping
make his characters relatable, Diaz makes sure that a reader would still be
able to connect to the characters more easily because the characters’ feelings
are, at first, seemingly left open to interpretation. Diaz does not mess with
the open and connection-ready text, because he still makes the feelings subtle,
instead of obvious. In this way, Diaz kills two birds with one stone- he makes
his characters complex and relatable, and he makes sure that readers can still
connect to the story and the characters at the same time.
These effects that
this style produces are massively important because it allows the reader to
connect to the characters, and because the characters are so complex, gain
something out of connecting to the characters. Connecting to the characters helps
develop the themes of the book in the reader’s head.
Diaz’s style of
subtle feelings is a plan that he uses to take the reader from looking at
something new and unfamiliar to understanding the characters and ideas that
Diaz presents in the book. This is done by leaving the text seemingly open for
connections by not forcing feelings onto readers. Once this happens, Diaz’s
second phase enters play- connecting the reader to the characters with the
emergence of the subtle, but important feelings of the characters. Finally, the
characters in the story are still complex and relatable because of how Diaz works
around the lack of many obvious feelings. All in all, Diaz uses this style to
write about a series of complex and multidimensional issues in a way that
allows most readers to help themselves connect to the issues, and the themes
presented in the story that come from these issues and how the characters react
to these issues.
Works Cited
Díaz, Junot. Drown. New
York: Riverhead, 1996. Print.
Rodda, Emily. Forest of Silence.
London: Scholastic, 2003. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment